A smartphone lock screen with a 6-digit PIN has 1,000,000 possible codes. A 6-letter password from the 26 letters of the alphabet — no repeats — has 165,765,600 possibilities. Why the enormous difference?
In PR-1, you counted outcomes by listing them. That works for small sample spaces. This lesson gives you three systematic methods that handle problems too large to list — and they plug directly into the probability formula you already know.
In PR-1, — but you found and by listing. Today you build the machinery to count and without listing a single outcome.
After this lesson, you will be able to:
Apply the Fundamental Counting Principle to count outcomes for multi-stage processes.
Compute factorials and use them in the permutation and combination formulas.
Calculate permutations and combinations for problems with ordered and unordered selections.
Identify which counting method applies and use it to compute probabilities over equally-likely sample spaces.
Section 2: Prerequisites
▾
What you need from PR-1
Equally-likely outcomes and (PR-1, Core Concepts C1–C2): Every counting technique in this lesson feeds directly into this formula. We will count and systematically — but the formula connecting them to probability is the one you already know.
Reading a sample space (PR-1, Core Concepts C2–C3): You listed sample spaces for small experiments. Today we replace that listing with formulas. Understanding what a sample space is — and why it must be complete — remains essential.
The complement rule (PR-1, Core Concepts C5):. In Section 9 (Challenge Problems), you will use the complement to avoid counting a large favorable set directly. The rule is the same; only the counting method is new.
Retrieval Checkpoint
A bag contains 5 red marbles and 3 blue marbles. One marble is drawn at random. What is ?
Also confirm you can recall:
Success Factor:
From listing to counting. In PR-1, finding meant listing outcomes or using a simple sample space. Today we unlock three methods — the Fundamental Counting Principle, permutations, and combinations — that count thousands or millions of outcomes without listing a single one, then feed those counts directly into .
Section 3: Core Concepts
▾
Navigation Guide — 6 Concepts
C1: Fundamental Counting Principle — “How many complete sequences are possible?” Use for multi-stage processes with independent choices.
C2: Factorials — the building block for permutation and combination formulas.
C3: Permutations — “How many ordered arrangements?” Use when the order of selection produces a different outcome.
C4: Combinations — “How many unordered selections?” Use when two selections with the same objects in different order count the same.
C5: Permutation vs. Combination decision — the single most important judgment call in this lesson.
C6: Counting-based probability — feeding counting results back into .
C1 — Fundamental Counting Principle
Imagine a restaurant with 3 starters, 5 main courses, and 4 desserts. How many distinct three-course meals can you order?
You have 3 choices for the starter. For each starter, 5 choices for the main. For each (starter, main) pair, 4 choices for dessert. Total meals:
This is the Fundamental Counting Principle (FCP): multiply the number of choices at each independent stage.
Fundamental Counting Principle
If a sequential process has independent stages — with choices at stage 1, choices at stage 2, …, choices at stage — the total number of complete sequences is:
Key requirement: The number of choices at each stage must not depend on the choices made at earlier stages.
Mini-example (2 stages): A student can take a morning class (4 options) and an afternoon class (6 options). How many distinct (morning, afternoon) pairs are possible?
pairs. Each morning choice pairs with each of the 6 afternoon options independently.
A tree diagram makes the multiplication visible. With 2 morning choices and 3 afternoon choices, every Stage-1 branch fans into 3 Stage-2 branches — giving complete paths:
Each Stage-1 branch fans into 3 Stage-2 branches — total is , not .
Adjust the choices at each stage and watch the tree grow multiplicatively. Try setting Stage 1 to 4 and Stage 2 to 3 — notice how every Stage-1 branch fans into exactly 3 Stage-2 branches, giving distinct paths.
Interactive tree diagram for the Fundamental Counting Principle.
Use the buttons to set the number of choices at Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Optionally add a Stage 3. The tree and running product update automatically.
Stage 1
(m1) =
Stage 2
(m2) =
Running product
When stages are NOT independent, the FCP does not directly apply. Suppose a PIN uses 4 distinct digits (no repeats). Stage 1: 10 choices. Stage 2: only 9 (one digit is used). Stage 3: 8. Stage 4: 7. Total = , not . The shrinking number of choices at each stage signals that this is a permutation problem — covered in C3.
In standard terminology: selecting with repetition means choices are independent (every stage has the same count). Selecting without repetition (also called without replacement) means earlier choices reduce later options, as in the PIN example above.
C2 — Factorials
How many ways can you arrange 3 books (A, B, C) in a row?
Position 1: 3 choices
Position 2: 2 remaining choices
Position 3: 1 remaining choice
Total: . List them to verify: ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CAB, CBA — exactly 6.
This product occurs so often it gets its own symbol.
Factorial
For any positive integer :
Convention:.
Factorials count the number of ways to arrange all distinct objects in a sequence. They grow rapidly: , , .
Why : The permutation formula (C3) requires to equal — the number of ways to arrange all objects. This forces . Also: there is exactly one way to arrange zero objects (do nothing).
See the cancellation: Expand into individual multiplied terms. Click “Show cancellation” to watch the denominator strike through the matching tail of the numerator, leaving only the highlighted terms — that is exactly how the permutation formula works.
Interactive fraction showing n! divided by (n minus r) factorial, expanded
as individual terms. Choose n and r, then click "Show cancellation" to see
the denominator terms strike through against the matching numerator terms,
leaving the r highlighted terms that multiply to give the permutation count.
n =
r =
n!(n − r)!
"" is the most common factorial error. It makes undefined or zero — but there is exactly one way to choose nothing from a set (the empty selection). Always: .
C3 — Permutations: Ordered Arrangements
In a club of 8 members, how many ways can we elect a president, vice-president, and secretary (3 distinct roles)?
Apply the FCP with dependent stages: 8 choices for president, 7 for VP (one member used), 6 for secretary.
This is — a permutation. We can write this more compactly using factorials:
Permutation
A permutation selects objects from distinct objects and arranges them in order. We write :
Use a permutation when order matters — a different arrangement of the same objects is a different outcome.
Special case: (arranging all objects).
Derivation from FCP: For position 1, choices. Position 2: . Position 3: . … Position : . Product = . Multiplying numerator and denominator by closes the form:
Use only when order changes the outcome. If you are selecting a 3-person team from 8 (not assigning roles), the order of selection does not matter — {Ann, Bob, Carl} and {Carl, Ann, Bob} are the same team. That is a combination (C4). Using when the answer is overcounts by .
Build a permutation: Click an object from the pool to place it in the next position. Watch the choice count above each slot decrease as the pool shrinks — that shrinking count is exactly where the formula comes from.
Interactive visualization with 5 labelled objects A through E.
Click an object to place it in the next position slot.
The badge above each slot shows how many choices were available at that step.
Click a filled slot to remove it and all slots after it.
Use the r tabs to change the number of positions.
Available pool — click to place
Your arrangement
Running product
C4 — Combinations: Unordered Selections
From 8 candidates, how many 3-person committees can be formed (no roles assigned)?
Each group of 3 candidates, regardless of the order we list their names, is the same committee. The permutation count of 336 overcounts each committee: every committee of 3 people can be arranged in orders — (A,B,C), (A,C,B), (B,A,C), (B,C,A), (C,A,B), (C,B,A) — all referring to the same committee.
Combination
A combination selects objects from distinct objects without regard to order. We write or :
Use a combination when order does not matter — two selections with the same objects in a different order count as the same outcome.
Properties:
(exactly one way to choose nothing, or choose everything)
Symmetry: (choosing to include is the same as choosing to exclude)
Symmetry as a shortcut:. When is large, use the symmetry to work with the smaller number.
Forward pointer to PR-5: In PR-5 (Binomial Distribution), the combination formula appears inside the binomial probability: . The counts the number of ways exactly successes can occur in trials — the formula you just learned is the key ingredient.
Explore permutations and combinations interactively:
Select a value of below. The left panel shows all ordered arrangements; the right panel shows all unordered selections. Click “Highlight groups” to see which permutations collapse into a single combination when order is ignored.
Interactive visualization showing all ordered arrangements (permutations)
on the left and all unordered selections (combinations) on the right,
for 4 objects A, B, C, D. Use the r tabs to change the selection size.
Ordered — ₄Pr12
÷ 2! = 2
Unordered — C(4, r)6
C5 — Permutation vs. Combination: The Decision
The core question is: does changing the order of the selected items give a different outcome?
Yes → Permutation. “Being first is different from being second.”
No → Combination. “Only the membership of the group matters.”
Scenario
Order matters?
Method
Elect president, VP, secretary from 12 members
Yes — different roles
Permutation
Form a 3-person committee from 12 members
No — same committee regardless of listing order
Combination
Arrange 5 songs on a playlist
Yes — different order is a different playlist
Permutation
Choose 3 toppings from a menu of 8
No — same toppings in any order
Combination
Signal words:
→ Permutation: “arrangement,” “ranking,” “ordered list,” “schedule,” “sequence,” “1st, 2nd, 3rd,” “code or password (when the problem states that order matters)”
“Combination lock” is a misnomer. A lock where 3-7-4 is different from 4-7-3 is actually a permutation lock — order matters. The everyday English use of “combination” does not match the mathematical meaning. In mathematics: “combination” always means unordered selection.
Use this flowchart to classify any counting problem. Expand the examples to see the formula applied to the scenarios from this lesson.
Does swapping two selected items produce a different outcome?
Electing a president, VP, and secretary from 12 club members.
Swapping president and VP gives a different outcome — order matters. 12P3 = 12 × 11 × 10 = 1320
Combination
C(n, r) = n! / [r! · (n − r)!]
groupteamcommitteesetselection
See an example
Choosing a 3-person committee from 12 members.
{Ann, Bob, Carl} and {Carl, Ann, Bob} are the same committee — order irrelevant. C(12, 3) = 12! / (3! · 9!) = 220
⚠"Combination lock" is a misnomer — it is actually a
permutation lock, because 3‑7‑4 ≠ 4‑7‑3.
C6 — Counting-Based Probability
When all outcomes in a sample space are equally likely, . Counting techniques give us both and when manual enumeration is not feasible.
The formula from PR-1 still applies — we just use counting tools to find the numbers:
Counting-Based Probability
When all outcomes are equally likely:
Both numerator and denominator are counted using the same method (FCP, permutation, or combination). The counting method must be consistent — never mix permutations in the numerator with combinations in the denominator.
End-to-end example: From a class of 20 students (8 who are athletes, 12 who are not), 3 are chosen at random. Find .
Total outcomes: equally-likely committees.
Favorable outcomes: All 3 from the 8 athletes: .
Explore all four outcomes: The bar below divides all 1,140 equally-likely committees by the number of athletes included. Click any segment to see the combination formula and exact probability.
Proportional bar showing all four outcomes when choosing 3 students from
20 (8 athletes, 12 non-athletes). Each segment width is proportional to
the number of equally-likely committees in that category.
Click a segment to see the formula and probability.
k = 3 all athletes (56)
k = 2 2 athletes + 1 non (336)
k = 1 1 athlete + 2 non (528)
k = 0 no athletes (220)
Click a segment to see the probability formula
Counting by complement. When the favorable set is large but its complement is small, it is easier to count what you do not want and subtract: . For example, is easier as than by summing three direct cases. This strategy becomes essential whenever a problem uses “at least one” or “at least ” phrasing — you will use it in the Challenge Problems (Section 9) and again in PR-5.
The opening hook — resolved. A 6-digit PIN uses 10 digits with repetition allowed: each position independently has 10 choices, so the FCP gives . A 6-letter password with no repeated letters selects without replacement — a permutation: . The enormous difference comes down to one design decision: repetition allowed (independent stages) vs. not (dependent stages).
Section 4: Worked Examples
▾
Example 1 — Fully Worked: FCP and Permutation
Part A: A restaurant has 4 appetizers and 6 main courses. How many distinct (appetizer, main course) pairs are possible?
Part B: In how many ways can a president, vice-president, and secretary be elected from a club of 12 members?
Part A — FCP:
I see two independent stages: choose an appetizer (4 options), then choose a main course (6 options). The number of main options does not depend on which appetizer I pick — the stages are independent. Apply FCP directly.
Total pairs = .
Part B — Permutation:
First I ask: does order matter? Yes — being elected president is a different outcome from being elected vice-president, even if the same person is chosen. The three roles are distinct. So I use a permutation.
members, positions. I write out the product from the FCP derivation to check my answer:
Using the formula: ✓
I pause to check: is 1320 reasonable? There are 12 choices for president, then 11 for VP, then 10 for secretary — . Confirmed.
Example 2 — Prediction Checkpoint: Combinations
A committee of 4 people is chosen from 10 candidates. No roles are assigned — the 4 members are equal.
Before computing: Predict whether is closer to 200 or to 5040. Write your reasoning, then check below.
Compute:
The answer is close to 200 — much smaller than 5040 (which is , the ordered version). Dividing by removes all the overcounting from treating different orderings of the same 4 people as distinct.
Symmetry check:. Verify: ✓. Choosing 4 to include is equivalent to choosing 6 to exclude.
Example 3 — Details/Summary: Counting-Based Probability
A class of 30 students contains 12 who play varsity sports and 18 who do not. Five students are randomly selected to present projects. What is the probability that exactly 3 of the 5 selected are athletes?
Show Solution
Step 1 — Identify the method. Order of selection doesn’t matter (3 athletes chosen from 12, 2 non-athletes chosen from 18, for a total committee of 5). Use combinations throughout.
Step 2 — Count total outcomes:
Step 3 — Count favorable outcomes: Choose 3 athletes from 12, AND 2 non-athletes from 18. The two choices are independent, so multiply:
Step 4 — Compute the probability:
Check the method consistency: Both numerator and denominator used combinations — appropriate since we’re forming an unordered group.
Example 4 — Find the Error
A student is asked: “In how many ways can a 4-person project team be formed from 9 students?” The student writes:
Student’s work:
“The team needs 4 people. The order in which we pick them gives the team its structure, so I should use a permutation."
"There are 3024 possible teams.”
Identify and correct the error:
The error is using a permutation when the problem asks for a team (unordered group). A project team has no internal ranking — {Ann, Bob, Carl, Dana} and {Dana, Carl, Bob, Ann} are the same team. The permutation count of 3024 treats every ordering of the same 4 people as a separate team, overcounting each team by .
Correct calculation:
There are 126 possible teams — exactly , confirming the overcounting factor.
Key signal missed: The word “team” signals an unordered selection. Had the problem asked for a president, secretary, treasurer, and recorder, a permutation would be correct.
Section 5: Guided Practice
▾
Problem 1 — Fundamental Counting Principle
Apply the FCP to count the total number of outcomes for a multi-stage process.
A breakfast menu has 3 options for eggs, 4 options for toast, and 2 options for drinks. How many distinct breakfasts (one choice from each category) are possible?
A locker combination lock has 3 dials, each showing the digits 1–6, and repetition is allowed. How many distinct settings are possible?
A student must choose 1 of 5 essay topics, 1 of 3 formats, and 1 of 4 fonts. How many distinct essay configurations are possible?
A license plate has 2 letters (from 26) followed by 3 digits (0–9), with repetition allowed. How many plates are possible?
A pizza shop offers 2 sizes, 3 sauce options, and 5 toppings (choose exactly 1 topping). How many distinct one-topping pizzas are there?
Problem 2 — Permutation Calculation
Given a scenario where order matters, compute the permutation.
Problem 3 — Combination Calculation and Symmetry
Compute and verify the symmetry property .
From 10 students, a group of 3 is chosen.
(a) Compute .
(b) What is , and what does it equal compared to ?
From 8 candidates, 2 are selected for a scholarship.
(a) Compute .
(b) What is , and how does it compare to ?
From 6 flavours, a sample platter uses 4.
(a) Compute .
(b) Compute and compare to .
From a team of 9, 5 are chosen for a work group.
(a) Compute .
(b) Compute and compare to .
From 7 available colours, a designer picks 3 for a logo.
(a) Compute .
(b) Compute and compare to .
Problem 4 — Perm vs. Combo Decision and Counting Probability
From a class of 20 students (8 who have completed a volunteering requirement, 12 who have not), 3 are randomly selected to give presentations.
(a) Is this a permutation or combination problem? Why?
(b) Compute the total number of equally-likely ways to choose 3 students from 20.
(c) Compute the number of ways exactly 2 of the 3 selected students have completed the volunteering requirement.
(d) Compute .
Section 6: Independent Practice
▾
Problem 1 — FCP Probability
Count total and favorable outcomes using the FCP, then compute the probability.
Problem 2 — Permutation vs. Combination Classification
Classify each scenario and compute the result.
9 books are available; 4 are chosen for an ordered reading list (the order matters — book 1 is read first, book 4 last).
(a) Is this a permutation or combination? Why?
(b) Compute the result.
A 5-member jury is selected from 12 candidates. No roles are assigned — all jurors are equal.
(a) Is this a permutation or combination? Why?
(b) Compute the result.
7 runners compete. Distinct medals are awarded for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place.
(a) Is this a permutation or combination? Why?
(b) Compute the result.
From 8 ice cream flavours, a customer picks 2 different scoops. The order of scoops on the cone does not change the dessert.
(a) Is this a permutation or combination? Why?
(b) Compute the result.
A password is 4 distinct letters from a pool of 10, and ABCD is not the same password as DCBA.
(a) Is this a permutation or combination? Why?
(b) Compute the result.
Problem 3 — Combination-Based Probability
From a group with a specific subgroup, find the probability that a random selection includes a given number from the subgroup.
Problem 4 — Find the Error
A student’s counting calculation is shown below. Identify the specific error and determine the correct answer.
Problem: “From 7 players, choose a starting lineup of 4 (no positions assigned).”
Student’s work:. “There are 840 possible lineups.”
What is the specific error?
Show Correction
A starting lineup with no positions is an unordered group — {Player A, B, C, D} is the same lineup regardless of which order the names are listed. The permutation overcounts each lineup by because it treats all 24 orderings of the same 4 players as distinct lineups.
Correct calculation:
There are 35 possible lineups. The ratio confirms the overcounting factor.
Problem: “A 3-digit code where all digits must be different, digits 0–9 allowed anywhere.”
Student’s work:. “There are 1000 possible codes.”
What is the specific error?
Show Correction
“All digits must be different” means once a digit is chosen for one position, it is unavailable for subsequent positions. The stages are not independent:
Position 1: 10 choices (any digit 0–9)
Position 2: 9 choices (one digit used)
Position 3: 8 choices (two digits used)
Correct calculation:
The student’s error is applying the FCP as if each stage has 10 choices, ignoring that the “all different” constraint makes later stages dependent on earlier choices.
Problem: “From 12 applicants, hire 2 (no titles or roles assigned).”
Student’s work:. Then: “But employee 1 and employee 2 are different people — I need to double this.” Answer: .
What is the specific error?
Show Correction
The combination already accounts for the fact that the two hired employees are different people — it counts each unordered pair of distinct applicants exactly once. Multiplying by 2 converts the answer from combinations to permutations:
This is correct only if the two hires have distinct roles (e.g., “employee 1 = manager, employee 2 = assistant”). Since no titles or roles are assigned, the pair {A, B} is the same outcome as {B, A}. The correct answer is .
Problem: “How many ways can 5 different people stand in a row?”
Student’s work:. “Each of the 5 positions can be any of the 5 people.”
What is the specific error?
Show Correction
Each person can stand in only one position at a time. Once person A takes position 1, they cannot also take position 2. The stages are dependent:
Position 1: 5 choices (any of the 5 people)
Position 2: 4 choices (one person is in position 1)
Position 3: 3 choices
Position 4: 2 choices
Position 5: 1 choice
Correct calculation:
The student’s error is the same as computing — assuming independence (with replacement), which would be valid if the same person could simultaneously occupy multiple positions.
Problem: Compute .
Student’s work: ” because you chose nothing, so there are no ways to do it.”
What is the specific error?
Show Correction
The student confused with 0. By definition, (there is exactly one way to arrange zero objects — doing nothing). Therefore:
There is exactly one way to choose nothing from a set of 10 — the empty selection. This result is also confirmed by the symmetry property: .
Problem 5 — Synthesis: Hiring Committee
A company’s hiring committee is reviewing 15 candidates: 9 with industry experience, 6 without. The committee selects 6 candidates to interview (equally-likely random selection).
(a) How many ways can 6 candidates be selected from 15?
(b) How many selections include exactly 4 experienced candidates?
(c) What is ?
(d) Is easier to compute directly or via the complement?
Show Solution
(a)
(b) Choose 4 from the 9 experienced candidates AND 2 from the 6 inexperienced candidates:
(c)
(d) Direct computation requires summing — three terms. The complement requires summing four terms (exactly 0, 1, 2, 3 experienced). Direct is marginally simpler here.
Preview: In PR-5 (Binomial Distribution), you will encounter a systematic formula for this type of “exactly successes” problem.
Section 7: Mastery Check
▾
Question 1 — Feynman Test
In your own words: Explain to a classmate who missed today’s lesson why you cannot always multiply the number of options at each stage together. Give a specific counting problem where multiplying all stage counts gives the wrong answer, show the incorrect count, and then give the correct count using the right method.
0 / 500
Model Answer
The Fundamental Counting Principle multiplies stage counts only when the number of options at each stage does not depend on earlier choices. When choices are made without replacement (or with any dependence between stages), the stage counts change as we proceed, so simple multiplication of the original counts overcounts.
Example: “How many 4-digit codes can be formed from digits 0–9 with no repeated digit?” An incorrect application multiplies — treating each position as having 10 independent choices. But once a digit is used in position 1, it cannot appear in position 2. The stages are dependent: is the correct count (a permutation ).
The key signal: “no repeats,” “distinct,” or “without replacement” signals dependent stages.
Question 2 — Apply
A student council has 8 members. A committee of 3 must be formed, and one specific member (the student body president) must always be included.
(a) How many such committees are possible?
(b) If the 3-member committee is chosen at random from all possible 3-person committees, what is the probability that the president is always included?
Solution
Part (a): The president is fixed on the committee. Choose the remaining 2 members from the 7 others:
Part (b): Total possible 3-person committees from 8 members: .
Alternative via complement:. So ✓
Question 3 — Error Analysis
A student is asked: “8 students are competing for 3 prizes — 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place. How many outcomes are possible?”
Student’s work: “Since we’re choosing 3 from 8, I use a combination: outcomes.”
What is the specific error?
Solution
The error is using a combination when a permutation is required. The three prizes (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) are distinct — awarding gold to Student A and silver to Student B is a different outcome from gold to B and silver to A.
Correct calculation:
There are 336 possible ranked outcomes, not 56. The combination would be correct only if the 3 prizes were identical (e.g., 3 students each receive the same award with no ranking).
Self-check using the relationship: ✓. Permutations = Combinations × (arrangements within the group).
Self-Assessment
How confident do you feel about the material in this lesson?
Still confusedReady for the Boss Fight
Section 8: Boss Fight
▾
Choose your path. Both paths require mastery of counting techniques — one tests computational fluency, one tests conceptual judgment.
🔐 Path A — The Cryptographer
Build passcodes for a new security app and compute probabilities under varying constraints.
🏒 Path B — The Tournament Director
Resolve a dispute about counting methods in a sports tournament, then compute probabilities.
Path A — The Cryptographer
A new app requires passcodes built from 36 characters (digits 0–9 and letters A–Z, case-insensitive). No character can be repeated. The passcode is exactly 4 characters long.
Task 1. How many valid 4-character passcodes are there in total?
Apply the Fundamental Counting Principle with dependent stages (no repetition allowed). Calculate:
Stage 1: 36 choices
Stage 2: 35 choices (one character used)
Stage 3: 34 choices
Stage 4: 33 choices
Compute the exact value. Hint: ; ; then .
Task 2. How many valid passcodes have a digit (0–9) as the first character?
Restrict stage 1 to digits only (10 choices). Stages 2–4 still have no repetition from the remaining 35, 34, 33 characters.
Compute this value.
Task 3. Using your answers from Tasks 1 and 2, compute .
Write the probability as a fraction and as a decimal.
Task 4. Now suppose repetition is allowed — any character can appear in any position. How does the total count from Task 1 change? What assumption about the FCP changes?
Compute the new total: .
Then write one sentence explaining the critical assumption that changed between Task 1 (no repetition) and Task 4 (repetition allowed).
Show All Solutions — Path A
Task 1:
Task 2: Stage 1 restricted to 10 digits; Stages 2–4 draw from the remaining pool.
Task 3:
Task 4: With repetition, every position independently has 36 choices.
The critical assumption that changed: in Task 1, once a character is used it cannot be reused — choices are dependent (without replacement). In Task 4, every position can use any character — choices are independent (with replacement). Only Task 4 uses the FCP with truly independent stages.
Reflection: What condition on the counting process is critical to applying the Fundamental Counting Principle in Task 1 vs. Task 4? In which task are the stages truly “independent”? Why does the number of choices per stage change in Task 1 but not in Task 4?
0 / 500
Path B — The Tournament Director
A hockey tournament has 10 teams. Two directors disagree about counting podium outcomes.
Director A claims: “The number of possible gold-silver-bronze podium outcomes is .”
Director B says: “No — it’s .”
Task 1. Who is correct and why? Identify the specific error in the incorrect director’s reasoning.
Recall: gold, silver, and bronze are distinct awards — the order matters. Write a clear explanation of the error, naming the correct formula and its justification.
Task 2. After the tournament, a 3-team organizing committee is formed from all 10 teams. No team has a higher role than another — all three committee roles are equal.
How many distinct organizing committees are possible?
Is this a permutation or combination? Apply the appropriate formula.
Task 3. The top 3 teams by regular-season standings are Falcons, Bears, and Eagles. Suppose all podium orderings (over all 10 teams) are equally likely.
What is ?
Favorable outcomes: number of ways Falcons, Bears, Eagles can be arranged on the podium (all permutations of these 3 teams)
Total outcomes: your answer from Task 1
Compute the probability.
Task 4. What is ?
Favorable: after placing Falcons (gold) and Bears (silver), how many choices remain for bronze?
Total outcomes: your answer from Task 1
Show All Solutions — Path B
Task 1: Director B is correct. Gold, silver, and bronze carry distinct ranks — awarding gold to Team X and silver to Team Y is a different outcome from gold to Y and silver to X. Director A’s error was applying , which counts unordered groups of 3 teams and ignores which team won which medal. Reconciliation: ✓.
Task 2: No roles assigned → unordered selection → combination.
Task 3: Favorable — Falcons, Bears, Eagles occupy all three medals in any of orders. Total — .
Task 4: Falcons = gold and Bears = silver are fixed. Bronze goes to any of the remaining teams.
Key signal words: When the order of selected items produces a different outcome (medals, roles, ranked positions) → permutation. When only the membership of a group matters (committees, teams with equal roles) → combination.
Reflection: Describe in one to two sentences the difference between the two types of counting problems you encountered in this fight (Tasks 1–2 vs. Tasks 3–4). Give a key signal word that identifies each type.
0 / 500
Section 9: Challenge Problems
▾
Ready for more? These go beyond the lesson objectives — they are entirely optional.
Problem 1 — Algebraic Proof + Combinatorial Argument
(a) Prove algebraically that by substituting for in the combination formula and simplifying. Show each step.
Which of the following correctly shows the simplified form of ?
(b) Give a combinatorial word argument: “Choosing objects to include is the same as choosing objects to exclude.”
Verify with , : List all pairs of objects chosen from {A, B, C, D, E}, and for each pair, identify the complementary group of 3 excluded objects.
Which reasoning below correctly restates the word argument?
(c) Use symmetry to evaluate efficiently without expanding .
Problem 2 — Complement Technique
Use the complement to find the probability that at least one card of a specified suit appears in a 5-card hand.
Problem 3 — Restricted Arrangements (Block Method)
Six friends — Alex, Blake, Cam, Dana, Evan, and Fran — are seated in a row of 6 chairs.
(a) How many total seating arrangements are possible?
(b) Treat Alex and Blake as a single “block” that occupies two adjacent chairs. How many arrangements have Alex and Blake sitting next to each other?
(c) How many arrangements have Alex and Blake NOT adjacent?
(d) What is when the seating is assigned randomly?
Section 10: Solutions Reference
▾
Quick-Reference Formulas
Formula
Name
When to use
Fundamental Counting Principle
Sequential, independent stages
;
Factorial
Arranging all distinct objects
Permutation
Ordered selection of from (order matters)
Combination
Unordered selection of from (order irrelevant)
Symmetry
Shortcut when is large; self-check
Counting-based probability
Equally-likely outcomes; use FCP/perm/combo for both numerator and denominator
Decision rule: Ask “does swapping two selected items give a different outcome?” Yes → permutation. No → combination.
Solutions and Explanations
For full worked solutions to all Practice, Mastery, Boss Fight, and Challenge problems in this lesson, see the solutions page: